We should be clear as to how the BBC reached its current situation.
In October 2010 Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary, wrote to Sir Michael Lyons, the then chairman of the BBC Trust, saying the licence fee would be frozen until 2017, and the BBC would be responsible for financing the World Service and a substantial part of the cost of the Welsh language channel, S4C. It would also be obliged to make £25 million available for up to 20 local non-BBC television services and to buy £5m-worth of material annually thereafter from them.
The process by which these fundamental changes took place was not resisted by the trust.
The Corporation may well have brought some of this on itself by paying absurd salaries to senior managers and to a number of star performers.
And now people are losing their jobs, which can only mean blighted careers.
It is clear that there will be less original programming and some of what is lost would have been of quality. However, it might be argued that we do currently suffer from a surfeit of broadcasting, and that much of what goes out, particularly in off-peak hours, is of limited value.
The cuts come at a tricky time. Pacific Quay has been increasing its share of network programming in line with a pledge by the director-general, Mark Thompson. But the proposal there should be a pan-Scottish digital channel is in financial uncertainty.
With the SNP Government committed to a strong cultural policy, and to a stronger Scottish broadcasting sector, there is a danger the cuts and the freezing of the licence fee until 2017 could be one of the flash points in the debate about the future constitutional status of this country.
l David Hutchison is Visiting Professor in Media Policy at Glasgow Caledonian University.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article