Opposition MSPs have mounted a challenge to plans to close courts across Scotland as Labour accused Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill of "ignoring" local communities.
Labour's spokesman Lewis Macdonald hit out at the Scottish Government after Parliamentary Orders to close 10 sheriff courts and seven justice of the peace courts were tabled at Holyrood.
The Labour justice spokesman said he was putting forward motions to annul the orders, backed by Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes.
The Scottish Court Service has recommended the closures, which could save £4 million a year in running and maintenance costs.
Earmarked for closure are sheriff courts in Dornoch, Duns, Kirkcudbright, Peebles, Rothesay, Cupar, Dingwall, Arbroath, Haddington and Stonehaven, with their business transferred to nearby locations.
Justice of the peace courts in Annan, Irvine, Motherwell, Cumbernauld, Portree, Stornoway and Wick also face being closed down.
The Parliamentary Orders will be considered by MSPs on the Scottish Parliament's Justice Committee.
The court closures could then be voted on by all MSPs at Holyrood, if the motion to annul the orders is backed by the committee – which has four SNP MSPs on it alongside four opposition MSPs and one independent.
Mr Macdonald said: "Kenny MacAskill is ignoring the views of local communities on court closures and the arguments made against those closures by MSPs of all parties last month.
"These closures can still be stopped. I am tabling motions to annul the Parliamentary Orders today, with support from other parties.
"If MSPs on the Justice Committee annul the Orders, Government ministers will be forced to justify their court closure proposals in the Scottish Parliament itself."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article