SCOTLAND'S largest local authority has overhauled its policy on infant cremations following the publication of a damning report into the Mortonhall baby ashes scandal.
Glasgow City Council has acted on Dame Elish Angiolini's investigation into Mortonhall Crematorium in Edinburgh, where ashes of babies were disposed of without the knowledge of their parents over several decades.
The authority, which was also implicated in the scandal following revelations in the capital, will use a broader definition of "cremated remains" than outlined by the Federation of Burial and Cremation Authorities.
From now on, all ashes left following a cremation can be provided to parents, rather than just "identifiable skeletal remains". The council said the change would mean ashes would be recovered in the vast majority of cases.
Trays for use in cremations of infants, which help retain remains, have also been ordered. The council has written to funeral directors in the city and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde asking them to ensure that bereaved parents are given accurate information.
Brian Devlin, Glasgow City Council's executive director of land and environmental services, said: "I hope that in the coming months all cremation authorities will be given a clear definition of what should be returned to bereaved families. However, until that happens we will move to use the definition outlined in Dame Elish Angiolini's report.
"The use of this narrower interpretation has meant that some families who wanted to have their baby's ashes did not get them and we are truly sorry for that. If any bereaved family has any questions about their baby then I urge them to get in touch with us and we will do everything we can to answer their questions."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article