A MASS legal action over equal pay claims by thousands of low-paid female workers at Scotland's largest local authority has fallen at the first hurdle.
The claim against Glasgow City Council by around 8000 workers was part of what has been called the second wave of equal pay and sought to challenge how the authority compared the salaries of female staff with males performing comparative roles.
Had the claim been successful the bill to the council would have ran into many millions of pounds, with speculation from within the authority that wages would have been cut as a result.
It followed a landmark legal ruling last year which opened the door to thousands of new claimants by allowing claims to be made within six years, where previously they had been time-barred after six months.
One of the three legal firms said it is "giving serious thought to" demanding a reconsideration of the 190-page judgement, which followed a 38-day hearing.
The legal teams for both unions and individuals have until late January to lodge an appeal and 20 days for the reconsideration.
The claim dates back to 2006 after Glasgow settled its equal pay dispute at a cost of around £50 million and went about re-evaluating all its jobs and creating a new pay scale.
But unions and solicitors argued the new system inherently discriminated against female workers.
A Fox and Partners spokeswoman said: "Regrettably the panel have found against the claimants. We will be meeting with our legal team in the New Year to consider our next course of action."
A city council spokesman said: "We are committed to ensuring all our employees are paid the appropriate rate for their job."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article