ONE of Scotland's smallest councils has accused the Scottish Government of leaving it "holed under water" after its request for millions of pounds for flood prevention measures was refused.
Labour-run Inverclyde Council had asked for £3million for a series of schemes. But the Government said the bid failed to meet the criteria for a major protection project and was instead "an amalgamation of clearance and repair works".
It also said the decision had also been taken along with Cosla, the umbrella body for all 32 councils.
Inverclyde is one of eight 'rebel' Labour-led councils to announce it is quitting Cosla.
Inverclyde was battered by storms last winter, with its key towns of Greenock and Gourock badly hit. The council's leader Stephen McCabe claims it was encouraged to bid and assured their proposals would be acceptable.
He said: "While the council has been left holed under the water by the Scottish Government's review panel it is the residents and economy of Inverclyde who will feel the real cost of this decision.
"This decision is particularly galling when it would appear there is still flooding money left unallocated."
He said the topography of Inverclyde meant it did not suffer flooding "by the bursting of one major river or a single catastrophic event" .
Inverclyde's chief executive John Mundell has also written to Government officials demanding clarity on the process involved.
A government spokesman said: "The panel's view was that the application was for an amalgamation of clearance and repair works, which had been pulled together in order to meet the minimum cost threshold of £2m, rather than a single large flood protection scheme requiring funding.
"Scottish Government and Cosla officials will discuss the process for the allocation of the balance of £19m funding that remains unallocated."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article