Councils have paid out more than £3.5 million compensation to Scots motorists in the past five years for damage caused by potholes.
More than half of that cash has been paid out by Glasgow City Council. Payouts to drivers by the council have totalled £1,821,576 over the period 2007-08 to 2011-12, according to figures obtained by the Conservatives under a Freedom of Information request.
Across Scotland, drivers have received £3,558,201 from local authorities to compensate for damage caused by potholes over the five years. The amount is increasing, with £1,232,908 paid out last year, compared to just £342,476 in 2007-08.
It comes after a survey of members of the AA found those in Scotland were most likely to report pothole damage, with 44% saying their vehicles had suffered damage in the past two years.
Conservative transport spokesman Alex Johnstone said: "Potholes are a real problem across Scotland.
"If the SNP dropped its anti-car agenda and actually tried to improve the roads, it could help save the councils some money."
While Glasgow paid out more than £1.8m, Orkney Islands Council compensation payments totalled just £244. But Mr Johnstone said many drivers could have had their cars damaged by potholes but not made claims.
He said: "No-one wants to take action against the council because it's a lengthy and complex process. But times are tight and a trip to the garage is rarely a cheap one. These figures won't even include the many people who simply can't face the red tape and pay for the damage themselves."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The maintenance of local roads is a matter for local authorities, who received almost £11 billion in Scottish Government funding this year."
Councillor David O'Neill, president of local government body Cosla, accused the Tories of "opportunistic council bashing" as he stressed authorities only pay compensation when instructed to do so by their lawyers.
Mr O'Neill said the Conservatives "should perhaps remember that councils are made up of all political parties and as they returned an increased number of councillors in the May elections, they are having a pop at themselves to a large extent".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article