A WATCHDOG'S plan to name and shame the worst-performing care homes and nurseries has been backed by politicians who said it is "the public's right" after a series of failings.
The Care Inspectorate is to alert the media to the country's lowest-scoring care facilities as well as highlight the best for the first time. The move is designed to help raise standards.
The push has been largely welcomed but sparked questions over the wider issue of the funding of care.
A spokesman for Scottish Care, which represents independent social care services in Scotland, said it supports "any initiative that supplies the public with clear information and assists them in making choices".
However, he added: "In these challenging economic times with constraints on public funding, some operators find making the necessary additional investments in workforce and the quality of care more difficult to sustain than others."
Neil Findlay, Scottish Labour's health spokesman, also pointed to funding concerns. He said: "The public must have the right to know how care homes are performing and whether they are providing good quality care for our loved ones so naming poorly performing care homes is a welcome initiative. Funding pressures are rife across the health and care system; we cannot have a system based on the lowest pay and minimal training for staff which then impacts on standards of care. Our elderly and vulnerable deserve better."
Jackson Carlaw, Scottish Conservative health spokesman, said that "too many families are being badly let down by certain failing care facilities".
He added: "Anything that pulls up standards across the board is to be welcomed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article