The head of Scotland's leading arts body has strongly defended controversial changes to its funding system.
Andrew Dixon, chief executive of Creative Scotland, said that instead of cuts, more money was now on offer to Scotland's leading arts companies.
Last week, Creative Scotland revealed how more than 70 companies would be put on either project funding or annual funding, with three companies given stable Foundation Funding.
Forty-nine companies, including notable names such as the CCA in Glasgow, NVA, The Common Guild, Vanishing Point, the Talbot Rice Gallery and Grid Iron, are now on project funding, while 22, including major festivals such as Celtic Connections, GI, the St Magnus Festival in Orkney, and the Edinburgh Fringe, are now on annual funding.
The changes led to companies expressing fears that not only were their futures now uncertain, but project-by-project funding could bring instability that they did not have under the previous two-year regime, known as Flexible Funding.
Mr Dixon, who is in Cannes for the official Scotland Day, told The Herald: "There is nothing to stop a lot of those companies coming forward with [project-based] plans for one or two years.
"We actually have more [Lottery] resources for them to bid into than the programme they have come from. And of course these are our top companies, producers and festivals, these are people who you absolutely want to invest in – there is no question of us not wanting to invest in them. What we have been trying to do is give them opportunity to grow."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article