SCOTLAND'S crisis-hit arts funding body has been told it still needs to do "further work" on improving its management.
Creative Scotland, which last year was heavily criticised by hundreds of artists, has been told by auditors that it needs to develop a framework for the management of the performance of the organisation.
The audit, carried out by KPMG for Audit Scotland and which is due to be published later this month, also strongly suggests the body should adopt the "best value" system used in local authorities to achieve the best results of spending public money and measuring its policies and systems.
The audit is the second for Creative Scotland and shows that during 2011/12 it spent £66 million on 1270 projects and initiatives.
Because of the time frame involved in the audit, it does not refer to the dramatic events of last year, when a series of controversies eventually inspired more than 400 artists and cultural figures to sign a damning letter to the body, which eventually led to the resignation of Andrew Dixon, the chief executive, and the departure of Venu Dhupa, senior director of creative development.
KPMG says: "Overall, Creative Scotland's evaluation indicates that further work is required to develop a framework for the management of the performance of the organisation, together with the identification of appropriate performance indicators consistent with the corporate plan and Creative Scotland's long-term vision."
Last night a spokesman for Creative Scotland said: "The report recognises that arrangements to deliver 'best value' are already embedded into the organisation's policies and procedures. Consideration is being given on the use of formal best value toolkits."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article