David Cameron has told fellow Nato leaders not to pay ransoms for countrymen kidnapped by Islamist jihadis, warning the multimillion-pound payments will simply be spent on more hostage-taking and increase the terror threat to their citizens at home.
The Prime Minister delivered his warning at the military alliance's two-day summit in Wales, which has been dominated by concerns over the escalating violence from militants of the Islamic State (IS) in Iraq, who have beheaded two US journalists and are threatening the life of hostage David Haines, 44, from Perth.
Mr Cameron, who is coming under growing pressure to unleash a military response, said Britain would use "everything we have in our armoury" to squeeze the terror group out of existence, and repeatedly refused to rule out joining the US in air strikes - even leaving the door open to attacking IS in Syria without the approval of President Bashar Assad.
But he appeared to indicate that such action was not imminent, stressing that his immediate priority was offering support to legitimate regional forces already confronting IS on the ground, such as the Iraqi government in Baghdad and the Kurdish authorities in the north of the country.
"I think sometimes people think that there is no strategy unless it simply consists of air strikes," said Mr Cameron. "That is not the case. What it needs is a fully-formed strategy to squeeze this from every angle. That is what you are getting from this conference."
Government sources said that, in a one-to-one meeting with US president Barack Obama, the two leaders discussed "broad strategy" for dealing with the terrorist threat, rather than specific action.
Mr Cameron said ministers were now "actively" considering whether to supply arms to the Kurdish peshmerga militias fighting IS in northern Iraq or to provide them with military training. Lieutenant General Sir Simon Mayall, the Government's senior defence adviser in the Middle East, has been in discussions with leaders of the Kurdish administration in Irbil about how best the UK could assist.
So far Britain has supplied only non-lethal equipment - such as helmets and body armour - although RAF transport planes have flown in ammunition supplied from Albania for the Kurds' Soviet-era weaponry.
Mr Cameron used an address at the lavish official dinner in Cardiff Castle to remind fellow leaders of commitments signed up to at last year's G8 summit at Lough Erne in Northern Ireland not to pay ransoms to terror groups.
While the UK Government has always said that it will not pay ransoms for British nationals, hostages from other countries - such as France and Italy - have been released after large sums were reportedly paid out.
Speaking ahead of the dinner, Mr Cameron described such payments as "deeply regrettable" and warned: "It is utterly self-defeating. It is worse than self-defeating, it is actually a risk to us back at home.
"All those people who signed these declarations know that what matters is not your signature on a declaration but not letting money be paid to terrorist kidnappers because that money goes into arms, it goes into weapons, it goes into terror plots, it goes into more kidnaps."
Reports suggested that Conservative MPs were being canvassed in Westminster over their views on potential air strikes against IS - also known as Isis and Isil - in what the chair of the Commons Defence Committee Rory Stewart said appeared to be an attempt to avoid a repeat of last year's vote against military action in Syria.
Leader of the Commons William Hague told MPs that ministers will seek Parliament's support for any British air strikes against Islamic extremists if "there is time to do so", though he added that the Government is not proposing military action "at the moment".
Asked whether the UK could join with the US in air strikes, Mr Cameron told ITV1's Good Morning Britain (GMB): "I'm certainly not ruling anything out and I will always act in the British national interest."
He added: "We need to show real resolve and determination, we need to use every power and everything in our armoury with our allies, with those on the ground, to make sure we do everything we can to squeeze this dreadful organisation out of existence."
He also stressed the urgent need for the establishment of an inclusive and stable government in Baghdad, which Iraqi prime minister-designate Haider Abadi has said he hopes to form by around September 11.
Labour leader Ed Miliband said he "would look at the merits" of any British strike the Government put forward.
He told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme: "It's a threat which can't be ignored. I think it's very, very important that we don't just turn away from it and say 'It's too big a problem'."
But Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said that any air strikes "would have to be part of a wider approach which hasn't been assembled yet".
Mr Clegg told BBC News: "Air strikes on their own - particularly if they are deemed to be air strikes by the West against the rest - don't work.
"So any consideration of a military component to what we are all doing as a community of nations to thwart Isil has to be a part of a jigsaw of other measures, which have to be and will be led by countries in the region themselves.
"We can only act in support of those countries that are on the front line against this terrible menace of Isil - the legitimate government in Baghdad, the legitimate authorities in the Kurdish northern part of Iraq."
Mr Clegg later cautioned against a precipitate use of military force, telling Channel 4 News: "One of the worst things to do would be to act rashly and ineffectually. It would be far better to make sure we act patiently and deliver a punch and deliver a blow to Isil which is effective."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article