THOUSANDS of Scottish victims of asbestos-related illnesses and their families will hear this week if they have won a long-running court case that could open the way to large compensation pay-outs.
Four insurance companies, including Excess which insured Fairfield shipyard in Glasgow, have been fighting since 2006 to restrict their liability to victims of mesothelioma, a cancer caused by exposure to asbestos.
The insurers have been trying to minimise the compensation by claiming that their liability starts when tumours develop, which can be decades after exposure. The lawyers for the victims and their relatives have been arguing the liability should apply from the moment the victims are first exposed to the dust.
It was reported that the Supreme Court would rule against the insurers on Wednesday, leading to an estimated £250 million in compensation pay-outs.
Laura Blane, asbestos expert at Thompsons Solicitors in Glasgow, said yesterday that a ruling against the insurers would be great news for the rights of asbestos sufferers in Scotland.
"It would mean that victims and families who have suffered due to asbestos can get justice they deserve," she said.
Meanwhile, a survey by the British Lung Foundation has found that two-thirds of Scots would not recognise potentially lethal asbestos in their homes.
The survey found that 70% of Scots admitted they could not confidently identify asbestos, with awareness particularly low amongst women.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article