Police reinforcements racing to the Hillsborough disaster to stop fighting on the pitch were told to "wipe the smiles off your faces because people are dying", the inquest heard.
With adrenaline pumping, it was suggested officers were looking forward to dealing with the pitch invaders as initially they thought they were being called to a public order incident, not a fatal crushing on the terraces.
Stephen Simblet, representing some of the families of the 96 Liverpool fans who died, questioned Richard Barnes, a police sergeant with South Yorkshire Police, but at the time of the 1989 disaster, a PC with fewer than two years' service.
Sgt Barnes told the hearing he was on duty in Rotherham on the day of the disaster when they got the call for all available units across the force to be scrambled to the stadium.
They were told it was a "critical incident" at Hillsborough of fighting on the pitch and left Rotherham for Hammerton Road Police Station near the stadium.
Mr Simblet said: "It would appear that the impression was given was someone at Hammerton Road Police Station that some among you were looking forward to expecting some form of confrontation because somebody said words to the effect: 'You had better wipe the smiles off your faces because people are dying.'"
Sgt Barnes replied: "Certainly not looking forward to confrontation, but obviously the reason we attended there was totally different to what we were informed."
Previously the jury has heard match commander Chief Supt David Duckenfield ordered an exit gate at the ground to be opened shortly before kick-off for the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest on April 15, 1989.
Supporters were still massed outside the ground at the Leppings Lane turnstiles with the central pens filling up.
An estimated 2,000 fans came in when the gate was opened and 96 fans were crushed to death.
The hearing, in Warrington, was adjourned until Monday morning.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article