THE destruction of almost 170,000 litres of radioactive fluid at Dounreay is likely to be completed within the next three months, its operators have said.
The work is seen as one of the greatest priorities in the clean-up of the UK nuclear industry and staff have worked in shifts around the clock during the Christmas and New Year period to keep on track the destruction of liquid metal from Britain's experimental fast breeder reactor, which was housed in Dounreay's landmark dome.
It follows a hiccup when the work was suspended for a week in October, after a pinhole in a stainless steel pipe allowed a litre of the radioactive fluid to escape.
More than 161,000 litres of sodium and potassium, which was used as coolant in the defunct reactor, have been destroyed so far and the site is on course to complete the destruction of the estimated 6300 litres still remaining by the end of March.
The toxic metal is lifted in batches from inside the reactor and its six miles of cooling pipes. According to Dounreay it is then processed through a purpose-built chemical plant to neutralise the alkalinity and extract the caesium contamination, leaving a salty water that can be discharged safely to sea.
Its rate of destruction means the major radiological and chemical hazard inside the reactor is reducing at a rate of 20 million bequerels (units of radio-activity) a second.
Andy Swan, the engineer in charge of the reactor decommissioning programme in Dounreay Site Restoration Ltd which is conducting the £2.6 billion decommissioning of the Caithness plant, said: "We're on course to destroy the remaining six tonnes by the end of March and deliver a major clean-up milestone for the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority."
Dounreay was constructed in the 1950s as an experimental nuclear power complex, but the third and final reactor shut down in 1994.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article