ALAN Rusbridger, the Guardian editor, has publicly spoken out about press freedom, whistleblowing and national security as he insisted the decision to detain Brazilian David Miranda under counter-terrorism legislation was a "clear misuse" of the law.
His remarks, at the Edinburgh International Book Festival, came as Scotland Yard and the UK Government's independent reviewer of anti-terror laws said they were each launching investigations into the case.
Mr Miranda, 28, the partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, who has worked with US whistleblower Edward Snowden on a series of security services exposes, was detained at Heathrow Airport for nine hours on Sunday under Section 7 of the 2000 Terrorism Act.
This week, it was revealed David Cameron directed Sir Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary, to ensure classified material obtained by the Guardian was destroyed.
Mr Rusbridger said of the Brazilian's detention at Heathrow: "It seems to me a clear misuse of a law."
He called for a debate about surveillance, praised the value of the information leaked by Mr Snowden and called "staggering" US soldier Bradley Manning's 35-year jail term for releasing government secrets.
"It cannot be that a small group of 'securocrats' get to make the rules, that no-one's allowed to write about it, if you blow the whistle on it you spend the rest of your life in prison and it's all discussed in a very small clique of people in parliament," he said.
"What Snowden has done is already incredibly valuable. He has already changed how this is going to be done in future and from my point of view, as the editor of a newspaper, I will carry on doing what I can do to aid that debate."
David Anderson, the independent reviewer of terror laws, said he would examine their use to detain Mr Miranda.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article