THE outgoing chairman of Scottish Gas parent Centrica has called for an end to the "Punch and Judy" debate over rising energy bills amid public and political anger at the Big Six providers.
In a robust defence of the industry, Sir Roger Carr has said investor confidence was being damaged by political rhetoric.
Figures in an analyst note from Liberum Capital reveal the extent of the damage from the recent reputational blows suffered by the sector, with £7 billion to £11bn wiped off from the value of energy stocks in the past two months.
Sir Roger, who is taking over as chairman of BAE Systems in the new year, wrote: "Political rhetoric [has] inflamed consumer passion, fed suspicion, discouraged investment and damaged investor confidence." He added: "All energy companies have been accused of profiteering, collaborating with competitors, manipulating costs to disguise profits, and caring little for their customers.
"These charges are false."
Any attempt to cap prices would threaten the "financial fabric" of energy companies, according to Sir Roger.
"They have short-term voter attraction, but lay a pathway to long-term under-investment," he said.
E.ON last week became the last of the major providers to raise prices, upping tariffs by an average of 3.7% from January 18.
It said it had scaled back a potentially higher price rise after the Government's change to green levies on energy bills.
British Gas said it would reduce bills by an average of 3.2% on January 1, following the Autumn Statement announcement, which comes after it informed nearly eight million customers of an average increase of 9.2% last month.
Sir Roger said the decision to raise prices was not made lightly.
"No energy company wants to increase bills - it enrages customers and damages relationships," he wrote.
Meanwhile, EDF Energy chief executive Vincent de Rivaz said politicians and the energy companies must work together to cut household bills and invest in new power plants.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article