ALMOST 70 countries have agreed a plan to protect one of Europe's rarest species of geese, but some Scots experts say scientists are ignoring a key threat.
About 50% of the world's population of Greenland white-fronted geese winter in Scotland, with an estimated 5000 spending more than six months on Islay.
The species is on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's "red list". Scientists say there is increasing evidence that spring snow in west Greenland is affecting breeding.
As a result, a plan for greater protection has now been signed under the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement, which brings together representatives of 67 governments and organisations every three years to discuss conservation needs.
Professor Tony Fox, from Aarhus University, Denmark, an authority on the Greenland white-fronted goose, said the population "in recent decades has been exposed to unprecedented environmental change".
However, Islay's farmers argue that climate change may not be the most important reason for the species's decline. They say that the white-fronted geese are now joined by 45,000 barnacle geese, which deny them the best grazing.
Gill Johnstone, Islay's representative of the National Farmers' Union Scotland, said: "We have been saying for a long time that the sheer growth of the barnacle population helps explain the decline of the white-fronted geese."
A spokeswoman for Scottish Natural Heritage said: "We have no evidence the Greenland white-fronted geese are suffering because of the numbers of barnacle geese on Islay. In autumn 2010 they came back to Scotland with the best breeding figures in 15 years which suggests they are not leaving Scotland in bad condition. But something could be happening on the way to the Arctic"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article