A failure to build new nuclear power plants could make it difficult to meet goals to cut carbon emissions, MPs have warned.
The Government seemed to be "crossing its fingers" that private firms would deliver reactors on time and budget, despite delays and cost overruns in other countries, the Energy and Climate Change Committee chairman Tim Yeo said.
A report by the committee raised concerns there was no "plan B" for the energy sector if the planned series of reactors were not delivered on time.
But Mr Yeo also warned any such contingency plan, which would rely on a step change in energy efficiency measures or an even greater reliance on renewables, was difficult to deliver.
Government climate advisers have said the electricity sector needs to be largely decarbonised by 2030 if the UK is to be on track to meet legally-binding targets to reduce carbon emissions by 80% on 1990 levels by 2050. However, all but one of the UK's nuclear plants are to close by 2023, and while there are plans for a new fleet, MPs had been told the proposals were "ambitious at best and unrealistic at worst".
"If new nuclear power stations are not built on time our legally binding climate change targets will be extremely challenging and much more expensive to build," Mr Yeo said. "The Government seems to be crossing its fingers that private companies will deliver a fleet of new nuclear power stations on time and on budget. Ministers need to urgently come up with a contingency plan."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article