New testimony has emerged over the execution of a Scots Guard for desertion during the Great War.
Private Isaac Reid, of the 2nd Battalion Scots Guards, was shot by comrades in 1915 for desertion following a court martial. Three of the four sergeant majors who had drawn lots for the shooting would die in battle, all on the same day, a month later.
Now testimony from the only survivor of the cast of principal characters has shed light on the episode and put a question mark over the story of a grim sequel.
In a book written in 1919, author Stephen Graham described an incident in which "Private X", dazed by shellfire, was reported as a deserter by "Sergeant Major Y" who has been thought to be Shropshire blacksmith's son James Lawton who died aged 35. On the basis of his testimony, "Private X" [Reid] was shot at dawn by colleagues ordered to form the firing squad.
On Graham's account, "Sergeant Major Y" [Lawton] was a martinet who "through army training, had become the sort of man who presented every fault in the worst possible light". After the execution, he was shunned and when mortally wounded at the Battle of Festubert in May 1915, was refused water by the men.
It has emerged Californian-based David James made a tape recording of his grandfather Alfred James's recollections in 1982. Mr James, then an Acting Company Sergeant Major, was one of the four who had drawn lots.
He does not name Reid and makes no mention of Lawton being shunned, or denied water while dying. It leaves the truth unresolved.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article