European Union leaders are downplaying an independent Scotland's right to EU membership to compel it to join the euro, open its borders and pay more towards the European budget, according to a senior German government adviser.
EU treaties are "consistent with automatic succession of both the seceding state and the rump state" but international leaders "have a vested interest in centralisation" and "are biased against secession", said Professor Dr Roland Vaubel, an adviser to Germany's economics ministry.
A string of European leaders, including EU Commissioner Jose Manuel Barroso, Vice-Commissioner Viviane Reding and EU Council president Herman van Rompuy, have all suggested Scotland would need to reapply as a new state if it left the UK.
Dr Vaubel said their position is based on a desire "to renegotiate the terms of Scottish membership", to bring them into the euro and Schengen borderless-travel area and give up the budget rebate negotiated by Margaret Thatcher in 1980s.
But he said the European leaders' arguments have "no basis in the European treaties".
Dr Vaubel is a member of the advisory council to the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, the second highest ministry of state in Germany similar to the UK Treasury.
Secession can be a positive force in western democracies, encouraging competition and improving the rights of citizens, he argues in the October edition of the journal Economic Affairs.
"The external effects of secession may well be positive. However, the political economy of secession is highly problematic," he said.
"Ideally, the rules for secession should be set at the international level but international organisations have a vested interest in preventing secession.
"The opinion of the European Union institutions that Catalonia and Scotland, after seceding, would have to reapply for EU membership has no basis in the European treaties. Nor has this question been settled in any UN agreement or Vienna Convention.
"Secession strengthens competition among governments. By putting the politicians and bureaucrats of different countries under competitive pressure, secession improves their performance. They grant more freedom to their citizens, and they are more efficient and innovative."
Any potentially negative consequences of secession, such as rising taxes due to diminishing economies of scale, may be offset by the increased democratic representation citizens achieve in a smaller state.
"I conclude that the spillover effects of secession on others are on balance more likely to be positive than negative," Dr Vaubel said.
"In Western democracies, the expected value of secession is positive, and the risks are not too large."
International organisations "have a vested interest in centralisation" and "are biased against secession".
He said: "The legal position taken by Barroso, Reding and van Rompuy has no basis in the European treaties. Nor is there a precedent in EU law. Nor does the UN Charter envisage dispositions with regard to secession.
"The treaties are also consistent with automatic succession of both the seceding state and the rump state.
"Why do Barroso, Reding and van Rompuy prefer the exclusion and re-accession of Scotland?
Citing evidence from other academics, he suggests that "the EU institutions want to renegotiate the terms of Scottish membership: Scotland would be asked to join the euro and the Schengen Agreement, and it would have to give up its part of the 'Thatcher rebate'."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article