The premature closure of Longannet power station at a time of falling spare capacity in the system is a "national scandal", the energy minister has said.
Fergus Ewing told MSPs the Scottish Government would "strain every sinew" to help employees at the struggling Fife station if the closure cannot be averted.
Operator Scottish Power has said that it will ''in all likelihood'' shut by March 2016 after losing out on a short-term National Grid contract to Peterhead.
In a statement at Holyrood, Mr Ewing defended the Government's renewables policy against claims it was harming power stations such as Longannet.
He said: "Some members opposite believe the development of renewables has harmed the prospects of thermo stations. Those arguments are false.
"They might have carried some credibility if we were in a situation of healthy oversupply, but spare capacity in the GB system has fallen to as low as 2% by next winter.
"The fact that we are even debating Longannet's future at exactly the point when the UK authorities have allowed energy security to dwindle so severely is a national scandal."
Mr Ewing said the Government was "determined" to explore any option that might avert the premature closure of Longannet.
The plant has been under pressure from new European Union (EU) environmental legislation and carbon taxation combined with higher transmission charges to connect to the grid due to its location in Scotland.
Mr Ewing said the UK transmission charging regime had "uniquely disadvantaged" Longannet, which was forced to pay £40 million to connect to the grid.
He said: "We believe the decision taken by National Grid and endorsed by the outgoing UK Government is flawed, and it fails to take account of serious flaws in the UK electricity supply system.
"Scotland has an established policy towards its electricity generation, one which recognises the need to maintain a balanced mix of generation, but our efforts are frustrated by the UK Government's unwillingness to address Scottish issues properly.
"Clearly, on a wide range of issues we remain at the mercy of decisions taken in Westminster over which this Parliament and this Government has no control.
"This lack of power over key decisions on energy policy should concern all political parties in Scotland and should prompt some deeper reflection on the future of our energy system.
"There will be opportunities to review the landscape for energy policy post-May but our immediate priority, ideally supported by a show of unity across this chamber, must be to avert the premature closure of Longannet."
Mr Ewing continued: "The UK authorities have created an environment in which it is increasingly difficult to operate thermo plant in Scotland.
"Scotland exported 28% of the power we generated in 2013 and we want to continue delivering large amounts of electricity across these islands, but our ability to do so is undermined by a UK framework that penalises Scottish generators and discourages investment.
"The location-based transmission charging methodology introduced to Scotland in 2005 under Labour UK government is the single and biggest and most pressing issue."
The energy minister said his thoughts were with the 270 people directly employed at Longannet and others in the supply chain.
He is to meet unions tomorrow to discuss the latest developments and said the Scottish Government will work with Fife Council on a joint response to the situation.
"The Government and all our partners will strain every sinew to secure the best possible outcomes for all off those affected and to mitigate the local and national economic impact if closure cannot be averted," he said.
Mr Ewing also called for swift action to progress a proposal from the Scottish coal industry to the UK Government for coal restoration, which he said could reduce Longannet's running costs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article