SHE is already known for penning one of the world's most controversial blogs – now former high-class escort girl Belle de Jour has sparked a furious row over plans to criminalise men who buy sex in Scotland.
Labour MSP Rhoda Grant is trying to introduce a bill which would radically change prostitution laws in Scotland, making it illegal to pay for sex. She has said this will help the "majority of unwilling participants" involved in prostitution.
However, critics say the proposals will not end the demand for sold sex and would increase risks for sex workers by driving the trade into more dangerous, out-of-sight areas.
Author Dr Brooke Magnanti, a research scientist who became world famous after writing about her experiences of working as a call girl in a blog under the name Belle de Jour, tweeted that the politician apparently thought it "okay if people die b/c of her bill".
Grant has now branded Magnanti's comments "a lie". She has also turned her fire on an article in The Huffington Post which Magnanti was responding to in her tweets.
The Huffington Post blog, by Alex Bryce of the UK Network of Sex Work Projects (UKNSWP), said Grant had suggested "damage to individual sex workers was a price worth paying" when quizzed on her proposals during a meeting at the House of Commons last year.
Grant has denied making the remarks and said she did not agree with the premise that making it an offence to pay for sex would lead to more danger for sex workers.
She said: "People are being hurt daily and that is the aim of the exercise – to try and stop people being hurt, so the very premise of his question is wrong. There is nothing I said which could be vaguely misconstrued as that. It is not something I would think or believe. This makes me angry."
She says she has complained to The Huffington Post. Grant also said the way she had been portrayed and "absolutely misquoted" shows the weakness of her critics' arguments. She added: "I can't understand why people who are supposedly there to work with prostitutes, assist them and help them would think those thoughts and indeed try and stop legislation which would only help."
Around 950 responses were submitted to the consultation on Grant's legislation. These are currently being analysed by the Scottish Parliament's independent non-executive bills unit. It is expected a report will be published near the end of April. Grant will then require the support of 18 MSPs to take the proposals forward.
Magnanti, who has lived in Lochaber in the Highlands since 2010, told the Sunday Herald: "Regardless of how one feels about prostitution, the safety of the people involved has to come first.
"Unfortunately, it's been shown that where 'end demand' laws come in, violence against sex workers goes up. Instead of ending demand – which is impossible – we should be reducing harm."
However, Jan Macleod, development officer at Glasgow Women's Support Project, disputed the notion that criminalising payment for sex would lead to more violence.
"I think that is a bit of a myth, because street prostitution already takes place in dangerous areas," she said. "We are supporting the principle [of the bill], but calling for wider measures, such as decriminalisation of prostitution - for the individuals who are selling sex."
The UKNSWP's Bryce has accused Grant of choosing to ignore those who the legislation will affect most in order to impose "what seems like a moral judgment founded on ideology".
He denied he had misrepresented what Grant said at the House of Commons meeting.
A spokesman for The Huffington Post said: "Huffington Post offers users a platform to air their views and opinions through blogs.
"In the blog there are no direct quotations, however we have made note of Rhoda Grant's concern and we're working with the blogger to clarify them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article