A FORMER STV executive, cleared of anti-English racism charges, has attacked the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act, meant to tackle sectarianism on the terraces, claiming it gives the police "draconian powers".
Alan Smart, STV's former head of current affairs, was acquitted last week of charges of acting in a racially aggravated manner after singing a song telling "English Tories" to "go home" outside the party conference in Stirling last year.
A sheriff ruled that Smart, 54, had no case to answer and acquitted him of the charges.
Smart said: "It is extremely easy to get yourself arrested if a police officer is of a mind to arrest you, and I'd imagine it's even easier in the context of a football arena."
He drew comparisons between the charges he faced and prosecutions brought under the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act.
The Act aims to clamp down on sectarian singing, gesturing and chanting at football games. Labour said last week that they would repeal the "anti-bigotry laws" if they win the next Holyrood election.
Smart's attack on the legislation has been supported by leading legal figures.
Paul Kavanagh, a Glasgow-based solicitor, said: "The more I have been involved with the prosecution of football fans, the more I've come to the informed view that the legislation is dreadful."
Advocate Niall McCluskey, a human rights lawyer, said: "What is required is the Scottish Government having the humility to take stock and actually address the concerns that have arisen."
Minister for Community Safety Roseanna Cunningham said: "We introduced this legislation in response to Scotland's police and prosecutors when they told us they needed greater powers to take a hard line on sectarianism."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article