Luck will play a role in the survival chances of Ebola patient Pauline Cafferkey because experts still do not know enough about the deadly virus, a microbiologist has said.
Professor Hugh Pennington said people with the disease can deteriorate "very quickly" after it emerged the British nurse is now in a critical condition at London's Royal Free Hospital.
Mrs Cafferkey, 39, has been receiving treatment at the hospital since Tuesday after contracting Ebola while volunteering in Sierra Leone.
Mr Pennington, emeritus professor of bacteriology at the University of Aberdeen, said he believed using blood from a recovered Ebola patient to treat the Scottish nurse was her "best chance" for a recovery.
"The condition of people with Ebola can deteriorate very quickly," he said.
"We have to keep our fingers crossed and hope for the best. It's the luck of the draw unfortunately.
"Some people do recover, but some don't make it. We still don't know enough about Ebola."
Mrs Cafferkey's sudden change in condition comes just days after her doctor said she was sitting up, eating, drinking and communicating with her family.
She is being treated with an experimental anti-viral drug along with the blood from a survivor after the hospital was unable to obtain ZMapp, the drug used to treat recovered British nurse William Pooley, because "there is none in the world at the moment".
Mr Pennington said: "The plasma is probably her best chance of treatment as that is actual antibodies from people who have recovered from Ebola.
"Because of the small number of people treated with experimental drugs, it's difficult to judge the percentage of success.
"We also don't know the circumstances of the infection. That might be important."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article