High-factor sun cream can not be relied on to protect against the deadliest form of skin cancer, new research has suggested.
The study by Cancer Research UK found that while high-factor sun cream can reduce DNA damage caused by the sun and slow the onset of malignant melanoma, it does not offer full protection. It proves campaigns are right to promote a combination of methods such as hats and shade alongside sun cream, scientists said.
During the study, mice who were predisposed to melanoma took only around 30% longer to develop cancer when coated in SPF 50 sun cream than those who were not. The research, published in the scientific journal Nature, revealed that UV light directly damages DNA in the skin's pigment cells, which increases the chance of developing the disease.
Scientists discovered that UV light also causes faults in the gene which normally helps to protect against sun damage.
Professor Richard Marais, study author and Cancer Research UK scientist, based at the University of Manchester, said: "This work highlights the importance of combining sunscreen with other strategies to protect our skin, including wearing hats and loose-fitting clothing, and seeking shade when the sun is at its strongest."
Dr Julie Sharp, head of health information at Cancer Research UK, warned that people exposed to sunlight must wear a cream with good UVA protection.
She said: "This research adds important evidence showing that sunscreen has a role, but that you shouldn't just rely on this to protect your skin."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article