THE right to have a family life shouldn't depend on how much you earn.
But immigration rules introduced by the UK Government two years ago mean that some families are being torn apart because they do not have a high enough income. Under the toughened criteria, any British citizen who wants to bring a husband, wife or partner from outside the EU to join them in the UK must earn at least £18,600 - around £5000 more than the minimum wage.
With average wages fluctuating significantly across the UK, this means there is a "postcode lottery", with an employee in the south of England far more likely to meet the requirement than a worker in Scotland. Those who are on the minimum wage are excluded, as is anyone who, for example, might have chosen to stay at home to care for their children. The gender pay gap means that women too are less likely to be earning the necessary income.
The argument from Westminster is that it needs to reduce immigration and prevent people establishing lives here at "taxpayers' expense". Yet the rules already mean the foreign-born spouse cannot claim most benefits for at least five years. It is a vastly different reality from the continual myth that immigrants only come to live off benefits.
The stance taken by SNP MEP Alyn Smith in questioning if the policy is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights is to be welcomed. Being able to enjoy a family life should not depend on your wealth and policies on immigration should not be based on the divisive agenda led by Ukip.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article