SCOTLAND'S family-owned country estates can contribute to the vibrancy of rural communities, a study found.
Landowners say they were "greatly encouraged" by the report, but critics insist it doesn't change the pressing need for further land reform.
The work by Scotland's Rural College is based on a study of 23 family estates of different sizes in Scotland. The report describes their characteristics and explores how they interact with local communities.
Report author Dr Mike Woolvin said: "Our study found examples of positive, productive interaction with communities as family estates seek to be strong and adaptable businesses and feed into wider rural resilience."
He said the estates' dominant activities were still farming, forestry, sporting and house letting. But quarrying, tourist accommodation, equine and renewable energy projects were growing in importance.
Douglas McAdam, chief executive of landowners' organisation Scottish Land & Estates, said: "In the current debates about land ownership it is all too easy to generalise and stereotype estates and landowners. We hope that this work will enhance the current debate by adding to the picture of estates and the role they can play in rural society."
A spokesman for Community Land Scotland, which represents the community buyouts, said: "The private estates may latch on to this report as evidence they hope will kill off the debate for more land reform, but it doesn't and it won't. Further land reform is a necessary part of building a fairer Scotland."
He said the SRUC report had looked at a sample of the tiny number of private interests who control the vast bulk of rural Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article