THROUGHOUT the Jenny Methven murder trial, much was made of the large sums of money found in the cottage the pensioner shared with her son David.
The court heard that a total of £159,000 was found in the house in Forteviot, Perthshire – including £105,000 stashed in a suitcase in a locked cupboard in the living room.
The victim's son David Methven, a millionaire who runs his own contracting business, claimed up to £30,000 of the cash belonged to him, and that his mother was "paranoid" about putting her money in the bank in case it was taken away from her should she go into care.
During the trial, Detective Sergeant Colin Lorimer, who led the police inquiry, was asked if he had information that Mr Methven may have had criminal links.
He replied that suspicions of threats from "Strathclyde-based, high-level criminality" related to another individual, Anthony Jamieson, who was phoned by Mr Methven on February 21.
Brian McConnachie, QC, defending killer William Kean, said: "What was your understanding of Mr Jamieson's connection to high-level criminality?"
Mr Lorimer said Jamieson was believed to be connected to the notorious Lyons crime family.
However, the policeman went on to say there was no link between Mr Methven and criminal activity.
Mr Methven also fiercely denied the claims in court and said he had simply done some work for Jamieson and they had subsequently become friends.
Papers from Glasgow Sheriff Court reveal Mrs Methven left behind £202,787.25 – most of it to her son. The dog lover left a charitable donation of £100 to the Perthshire Abandoned Dog Society and £1000 to a Claire Urquhart from Spalding, Lincolnshire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article