AN MSP has raised concerns about potential cuts at North Lanarkshire Council, which could see the equivalent of around 1300 full-time jobs being axed.
The local authority said it will launch a public consultation next month as it has to save £73.3 million in three years.
It has set out draft "savings options", totalling £105.7m. If they are all implemented, 1387 full-time equivalent posts could go.
It said the final number would be significantly less depending on the decisions councillors reach.
John Pentland, Labour MSP for Motherwell and Wishaw, said he was "very concerned" about potential job losses.
He said: "But let us be clear where the responsibility for these cuts lies. They are a direct consequence of the Scottish Government's deep cuts in local government budgets. North Lanarkshire's funding from government is dropping 3% next year, on top of this year's 2.5% real-terms cut.
"That's 5.5% being cut over just two years, while the rest of the Scottish budget is only being cut by 0.3%. Next year local authorities are taking over 90% of the hit. The Scottish Government are not just passing on UK cuts, they are more than doubling them."
Councillors will meet next week to consider the options and consultation plan.
The council's chief executive, Gavin Whitefield, said a huge consultation exercise would be undertaken if the plan was approved.
Health Secretary Alex Neil criticised the council, saying the proposed cuts are a result of "financial mismanagement".
The MSP for Airdrie and Shotts said the Labour-run council is "butchering frontline services".
Mr Neil said: "The leadership is cutting the wrong services yet again. We are going to be left with piles of rubbish on street corners and school children forced to walk miles to school. It's like something out of a Dickens novel, not 21st- century Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article