A FRONTLINE Army medic serving in Afghanistan's Helmand province has told of how she wept when her first casualty died.
Private Natasha Smith had never seen a dead body before being deployed with 3 Medical Regiment in October.
But, just weeks into her six-month tour of duty, the 20-year-old from Glasgow treated an eight-year-old boy who was hit by a truck and, despite rescue efforts, died in her arms.
She said: "The children are the hardest to deal with, especially my first one who died. That was horrific. I had never seen any casualties or any dead people and then the very first casualty I had was a child.
"But the TRiM [Trauma Risk Management] process at PB's [patrol bases] is pretty good.
"Having the girls around helped – if it had just been full of boys, it would have been a lot harder. I did cry, to be honest."
Pte Smith is one of just five women living among 160 squaddies at a base known as Lash Durai – the most easterly military outpost in Helmand.
She is attached to the Scots Guards and regularly accompanies the infantry soldiers and their Afghan counterparts on operations and foot patrols.
On occasions Pte Smith has put her sense of duty before her own safety to help wounded comrades. "When I had [to deal with] the upturned Mastiff [a military patrol vehicle], obviously it hit an IED [improvised explosive device]. So I had one guy shouting at me to walk up the track the wagon had taken to get to the back of the Mastif, then the IED clearance team told me not to walk up there. It was a horrible position – to go or not. But, I ended up just running up anyway."
Despite the austere conditions – no toilets and showers made of empty ammunition tins – she was surprised by the situation on the ground. "The way they make out in training is like every step you are going to stand on an IED and you are going to be getting shot at constantly and it is going to be really horrific," she said. "It is not at all."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article