A MOTHER-OF-TWO who died after falling 50 feet into a mine shaft would be alive today if vital medical training now planned for firefighters been in place at the time of her fall, her family has claimed.
The family of Alison Hume, 44, spoke out after Scotland's chief inspector Inspector of Fire and Rescue, Steven Torrie said he now wants the country's firemen and women to become medical life-savers and to turn out to health emergencies as well as fires.
Mrs Hume, a solicitor, was left down a deep hole in Ayrshire while commanders from Strathclyde Fire and Rescue worried on the surface about health and safety.
During her attempted rescue in 2008, two fire commanders stopped a paramedic going into the hole in Galston, leaving her in the sole care of firefighter Sandy Dunn.
He was trained to fit a neck brace and was a First Aider but Mr Torrie's recommendations go much further than this. He wants fire first responders to be equipped with defibrillators, which can save the life of a heart attack victim.
It was a heart attack which eventually killed Mrs Hume, just as she was being lifted, after spending more than six hours below the surface. Mrs Hume's stepfather, Hugh Cowan, said: "Had these changes been in place six years ago, Alison would still be here.
"Even if a paramedic was unable to get to her - for whatever reason - a fully-trained fire fighter properly equipped could have saved her. I am not for a minute blaming Sandy Dunn. To our family, he is a hero and should have received a medal for want he did for Alison.
"But we, as a country, are living in the dark ages as far as emergency responses are concerned. These changes are long overdue."
During his campaign for justice for Alison, Mr Cowan researched the way fire services across the world react to emergencies.
He found fire rescue services doubling up as medical responders in Ireland, Australia, America and Canada.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article