A REALITY TV star has been jailed for contempt of court and berated by a sheriff for her attitude towards her son.
Former Apprentice contestant Sharon McAllister, 38, was sent to prison for three months after repeatedly failing to hand her son over for contact with his father.
McAllister was told 'you're jailed' and led off in handcuffs after being found guilty of contempt of court in a long-running civil court battle with her former partner.
Sheriff Fiona Tait told her: "It gives me no pleasure whatsoever to do this. This is about the best interests of the child.
"These were bad findings of contempt and, given your conduct since, I consider the only way to deal with the matter is by a custodial sentence.
"You have given excuses throughout - that is the way you have operated. I am very sorry this position has been reached but I consider you have shown - in the 15 months since the finding of contempt - that you will not obtemper the court order.
"The finding of contempt was made in October 2013. I made it clear I considered your actions had been flagrant contempts of court.
"My priority was to provide you with the opportunity to obey the court order. That was principally because it was in the child's best interest to have contact with his father.
"It has been noted in a number of reports you have an entrenched position against contact. My fears were unfortunately realised.
"I am satisfied that the situation is that you remain opposed and will do whatever possible to obstruct the order of the court."
Perth Sheriff Court was told that McAllister had repeatedly sabotaged agreed periods when her young son was due to be handed to the care of his father.
Despite numerous direct warnings from the court, she continued to fail to hand the child over.
Outside court, he said: "This has been going on for years. It has been a nightmare. I just hope other fathers don't have to go through what I've had to go through.
"Sharon has brought it all on herself. I have no sympathy. Fathers are entitled equally to see their children, because they love their children equally.
"I hope other mums who might think they can do this will take heed that the system isn't open to abuse like this, and that dads are entitled to their rights too."
The court heard that McAllister, who has pursued a string of failed businesses ideas, was now self-employed but was again running a business making no money.
She lives at home with her parents and her older son and is living on working tax credits, maintenance and child benefit amounting to £1,100 per month.
She has previously been ordered to hand back £20,000 to the Scottish Legal Aid Board after a sheriff ruled she had repeatedly wasted court time.
The mother-of-two pled poverty - telling Perth Sheriff Court she had less than £300 in the bank - and asked the court to limit the sum she had to pay.
But Sheriff Fiona Tait only cut the bill from £24,000 to £20,000 after being told McAllister paid a £1,400 a month mortgage on a second home which she lets her parents live in rent free.
She admitted her second home at Forest Mill, Clackmannashire, had been valued at £385,000.
McAllister was given legal aid to defend the civil action by her former partner and the case has called in court on more than 30 occasions over the past four years.
Sheriff Tait ruled that significant costs had been incurred by McAllister wasting court time. She said the ex-Apprentice star had been a drain on "public funds".
"Court days were allocated and lost. A morning was disrupted. I have had regard to her conduct and am satisfied that not only is that conduct rightly subject to criticism, but it has also resulted in unnecessary expense.
"The entire process was necessitated by her failure to allow contact."
Scottish Legal Aid Board solicitor Scott Cownie told the court McAllister had cost the taxpayer "tens of thousands of pounds".
McAllister featured in the second series of the BBC show, fronted by Lord Sugar, but was told "you're fired" midway through the process.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article