A FORMER employee of ex MP Jim Devine has urged a judge to award her £75,000 over 'defamatory' comments that the disgraced politician allegedly made about her.
Marion Kinley, 50, told Lord Bannatyne that the former Labour Party politician spread lies about her visiting casinos and stealing money from him.
Ms Kinley worked for Mr Devine, 60, as his constituency office manager when he sat as Labour MP for Livingston in West Lothian, after he was elected in September 2005. He was jailed for 16 months in March 2011 at the Old Bailey in London for fraudulently claiming expenses.
She is now suing him at the Court of Session in Edinburgh after raising a defamation action against him.
She claims that Devine, of Blackburn, West Lothian, made false allegations against her. She says that it has damaged her reputation and has made it difficult to earn a living.
On Thursday, Ms Kinley told Lord Bannatyne that he made those remarks while being investigated by the Metropolitan Police over his expense claims.
She added: "He knew what he was saying was false. He said it to save his own skin. He said these things to protect himself from the forthcoming political storm.
"He has put me through the mill."
Ms Kinley, of Bishopbriggs, East Dunbartonshire, spoke as she made her closing submissions.
She and Mr Devine are representing themselves in proceedings.
In his defences, Mr Devine maintains he didn't make such comments and claims that had he said the things claimed he would have been speaking truthfully.
The court had earlier heard Ms Kinley claim that Mr Devine had said that she had helped herself to bonus money that she wasn't entitled to and that she was being investigated by the police.
Devine denied that he had committed any wrong doing. He added: "I did not make these statements."
Lord Bannatyne's decision will be issued later.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article