Former MP Clare Short has criticised Benefits Street - the Channel 4 show filmed in her former constituency - calling it "crummy and misleading".
The ex-Secretary of State for International Development branded the controversial documentary an excuse for "viewers to judge and sneer".
Ms Short was MP for Ladywood, the Birmingham constituency where the TV series is set, for 27 years and grew up in the vicinity.
She told the Radio Times that the programme focused on so few of the nearly 100 houses on John Turner Street that it was "totally unrepresentative."
Benefits Street has been a ratings success for Channel 4, attracting between four and five million viewers.
But TV bosses have been accused of turning poverty into entertainment with the series, which has attracted more than 1700 complaints.
Former Labour MP Ms Short told the magazine that up until the 1980s, when the area was hit by unemployment and a "new culture of drugs, crime and mental health problems", everyone was in work.
She said the show was not representative because "in a typical Ladywood street of 100 houses, 42 people would be living on the state pension, 15 would be sick and disabled (many of them also old) (and) those on Jobseeker's Allowance would be fewer than three."
Ms Short, who stood down as an MP at the 2010 general election, said of the show: "It seems, to me at least, another example of the voyeur, Big Brother phenomenon."
Ofcom has received 956 complaints and Channel 4 said it had just over 800, while another 100 contacted the broadcaster to say that they liked the show.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article