Some women are likely to make fraudulent claims about being sexually abused by television personality Jimmy Savile, appeal judges have been told.
Trustees of a charity that is the major beneficiary of Savile's estate told the Court of Appeal that compensation claims had to be scrutinised.
They also said they had concerns about a compensation scheme agreed between the executor of Savile's estate - the NatWest bank - and lawyers representing alleged victims.
Earlier this year a High Court judge approved the scheme set up for victims of Savile, who died in October 2011 aged 84, despite objections from the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust.
Mr Justice Sales sanctioned the scheme following a High Court hearing in London in February and refused to order the NatWest bank to be replaced as executor.
The Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust wants the Court of Appeal to overturn Mr Justice Sales' decisions.
Three appeal judges began to analyse legal argument at a hearing in London, which is expected to end today.
Mr Justice Sales heard that Savile had been the subject of an ITV television programme broadcast in October 2012.
The judge said Savile, who worked at the BBC, had been accused of being a "serial child abuser and sex offender" and was alleged to have abused people in hospitals.
He said following the broadcast a "large number" of people had come forward to make claims that they were abused by Savile.
Lawyers say the number of people intending to make claims has now risen to more than 160.
Robert Ham, QC, for the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust, said the compensation scheme agreed did not assess the "validity" of claimants.
He added: "As a matter of common sense these sort of situations are likely to attract numbers of fraudulent claims. One certainly cannot proceed on the basis that the claims are valid."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article