The security firm that transfers prisoners to courts has been late on nearly 22,000 occasions since taking over the contract at the start of the year.
Between January 10 and September, G4S was late in bringing prisoners to court 21,735 times, resulting in financial penalties of £334,500, Scottish Prison Service figures show.
G4S is the firm which was at the centre of the London 2012 Olympics staffing fiasco, when Armed Forces had to be drafted in because the company failed to supply enough staff.
The figures were revealed by the Scottish Government in response to a written question from Labour. The party's justice spokesman, Lewis Macdonald, said: "These figures show just how shoddy the basic service being provided by G4S is. I'm relieved they are being hit in the pocket for their poor performance.
"Scottish Labour again calls on the Scottish Government to stop awarding contracts to the company until their performance can be shown to be much better than it is at present."
A Scottish Prison Service spokeswoman said: "The number of delays to court business as a result of late deliveries of prisoners to court in the past 11 months has been very small and there has been a significant improvement in delivery performance since the contract became operational in January."
A G4S spokesman said: "We have retrained staff and introduced new procedures and our client, the Scottish Court Service, has noted a significant improvement in performance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article