GAS and oil companies have called on the Scottish Government to offer more support for fracking.
The industry body representing onshore exploration companies yesterday stepped up pressure on ministers to get behind the controversial extraction technique.
Ken Cronin, chief executive of the UK Onshore Operators Group, said the industry could create jobs, safeguard the future of the Grangemouth refinery and improve Scotland's energy security.
Speaking after addressing a committee of MSPs, he said: "I don't think it makes sense for one of our biggest industries, Grangemouth, to be importing raw materials from the US when we can produce them in Scotland.
"Scotland does extremely well in terms of renewable energy but the reality is 79% of our heating and cooking comes from gas.
"By 2030 most of that will come from outside the UK so it makes sense for us to have some energy security."
Fracking - hydraulic fracturing - involves pumping water, sand and chemicals deep into the ground under extreme pressure to crack shale rock and release the gas. Opponents have raised concerns about possible environmental damage and harm to property.
Prime Minister David Cameron intervened last month to encourage fracking schemes south of the border.
The Scottish Government has taken a more cautious approach, stressing any planning bids would be "studied on their merits".
A survey published yesterday by the UK's Department For Energy And Climate Change said 27% of people backed fracking, 21% were opposed and 48% neither opposed nor supported it.
Tory MSP Murdo Fraser said: "Shale gas has the potential to reduce fuel poverty and create thousands of well-paid jobs. The Scottish Government must use this evidence as a green light to fully support fracking."
Holyrood's economy committee is looking at Scottish Government proposals for a 2km buffer zone between any fracking sites and areas of housing.
A Scottish Government spokesman said it recognised the "potential" for unconventional gas but was taking a "balanced, responsible, evidence-based approach to its development".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article