Glasgow and Aberdeen Airports have been put up for sale and negotiations are ongoing with a potential buyer.
Talks also involve the possible purchase of a sister airport at Southampton with all three currently owned by London-based Heathrow Airport Holdings.
A mystery buyer has been in discussions with HAH officials amid speculation it could be HAH's biggest shareholder - the Spanish transport infrastructure giant Ferrovial.
Talks are thought to have been going on for months after a potential rival walked away from the negotiating table. A consortium led by the Switzerland-based Partners Group withdrew a few months ago.
The Swiss were backed by council leaders in Glasgow with financial support promised by the Strathclyde Pension Fund - the richest council pension fund in the UK with assets totalling £13.5billion.
Ferrovial owns a 25% stake in HAH and had been expected to splash out £800million to secure total control of the business and ownership of the three airports. It already owns Heathrow.
Airport workers were told by e-mail the airports had been put up for sale and negotiations had already started with an unnamed party.
One worker said: "We are under strict instructions not to talk to you people in the media and that their own press team are dealing with inquiries. But obviously the uncertainty is worrying for us all."
Glasgow Airport employs around 450 workers and supports more than 7,000 others across Scotland.
Last night a statement from Heathrow officials, said: "Over recent months Heathrow Airport Holdings group shareholders and management have been considering their strategic position in relation to our three airports, Aberdeen, Glasgow and Southampton.
"As a result the group is now formally entering a sale process. While there is currently no certainty that a sale will be concluded, the group intends to work towards completing a transaction by the end of the year."
A spokeswoman for HAH said: "We can't really comment beyond our statement because it is very commercially sensitive at the moment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article