A leading architecture critic believes if it is possible to restore the Glasgow School of Art, it should be supported with an international fund-raising appeal.
Hugh Pearman, who is also editor of the RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects) Journal, believes that the international architecture community would "come together" to support a restoration.
He said: "Normally I say don't try to create something in replica, it's never the same, and you can never be entirely accurate anyway. What about the marks of age, the wear and tear, the splash of the paint that made it so good.
"You could say, it's gone don't try to replicate it, let's have some international competition of the kind that led to the creation of the school in the first place and insert something fantastic and modern into the shell.
"But right now, I am emotional about it, I feel there should be a full restoration, very slow, very careful, very forensic, taking as long as it takes.
"If necessary there should be an international appeal to raise funds for it. This building is famous around the world. The international architecture community, I think, will come together to help this.
"If there is something we can salvage then I thing we should build on that."
He cited the example of the successful five-year restoration of Windsor Castle following a blaze which caused up to £60 million of damage in November 1992. He said: "If you are going to do a complete authentic restoration, then craft skills are needed, Windsor Castle is what springs to mind here."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article