Warm bodied fish, including the Great White shark, can swim more than twice as fast as other colder bodied species, according to new research.
Fish that are warm bodied, including the well known villain of the Jaws films, gives them the ability to swim at cruising speeds approximately two half times faster than other similar sized cold-bodied species. This is a characteristic they share with some species of tuna and sharks.
The remarkable finding is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Dr Yuuki Watanabe of the National Institute of Polar Research, Japan, who led the study, said, "The physiological mechanism of keeping heat in the body is well understood. But, more a fundamental question is, why this unique evolution occurred in the first place. In other words, what kind of advantages do the fish gain from being warm bodied?"
Dr Yannis Papastamatiou of the University of the St Andrews Scottish Oceans Institute is one of the team of researchers who made the discovery.
The team gathered and analysed data from previous studies as well as collecting their own data by attaching speed sensors to sharks in Alaska, the Bahamas and the central Pacific, to compare swim speeds of warm and cold-bodied fishes.
"Fishes are generally considered cold-bodied in that their body temperatures are very similar to that of the water they reside in," said Dr Papastamatious.
"However, amazingly a small number of tunas and sharks, including white sharks, have evolved the ability to maintain their body temperatures higher than the surrounding water - sometimes up to 20°C warmer.
"We found that on average, warm bodied fishes can swim almost 2.7 times as fast as cold blooded species, likely because the warmer muscle temperatures enhances power output."
The team also found evidence that these increased swim speeds allow some warm bodied fish to migrate large distances in a relatively short period of time.
"As such these animals can swim to distant locations and back again which may allow them to take advantage of seasonal pulses in food or other resources," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article