A Hebridean guesthouse owner is thought to be the first to sue the global Tripadvisor website in a Scottish court.
Richard Gollin, who runs the six bedroomed Baille na Cille guesthouse at Uig on the west coast of Lewis, claims that negative criticism posted about his business is false and should be removed by Tripadvisor.
He is taking the travel guide to court over an alleged malicious posting.
Mr Gollin has launched a small claims action in Stornoway Sheriff Court and maintains the website has hurt business through lost bookings.
He argued the website, which is the world's largest travel site, is rife with inaccurate or false guest reviews.
Mr Gollin said that a scathing posting was made by a guest who criticised the food and claimed visitors were underfed.
Mr Gollin added that the quality of meals is good and insisted "our portions are certainly not small".
He claimed the writer gave the wrong date when he stayed "to cover his tracks" and said: "I believe that one lie should disqualify this entry.
"Tripadvisor is in dereliction of duty in failing to have proper supervision" of what goes on their website.
"All across the country people should stand up to Tripadvisor."
Mr Gollin said he has lost bookings as a result and is seeking compensation from the USA-based online holiday review guide.
He has not disclosed the level of damages sought but £3000 is the maximum limit under the small claims procedure.
Tripadvisor insists to the court it is not subject to the law in Scotland.
Its legal team from its Massachusetts headquarters in the United States has directly instructed Stornoway lawyer Angus Macdonald.
He is asking Sheriff David Sutherland to kick the case out of court, claiming it is outwith Scottish jurisdiction.
Mr Gollin, who lodged papers at the court yesterday, was originally repesenting himself but has now hired a lawyer.
Tripadvisor, which has faced a number of legal actions from businesses in England and the US, declined to speak about the case.
A spokesperson for the travel website said: "We do not comment on threatened or pending litigation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article