The 500 residents on the last large privately owned estate on the island of Harris have voted overwhelmingly to press ahead with a community buyout.
A feasibility study to purchase the 25,000-acre Bays of Harris Estate using right-to-buy provisions will now be carried out.
The estate covers much of the east coast of Harris from Tarbert to Northton at the south end of the island.
Although there are still smaller private estates in the area, if a community buyout succeeds it would mean the vast bulk of Harris is brought under community ownership.
Alan Ross, clerk to the South Harris Community Council, said: "If the feasibility study was positive and there was continued support we would progress to a postal ballot. There is enthusiasm because they see the benefits the communities elsewhere on Harris have been enjoying since their buyouts.
"We have got to try to stabilise the population. When I used to came here to Finsbay to stay with my grandfather there would be 20 or 30 kids of school age. Today there are four in the whole village."
Harris has suffered from chronic depopulation, more than other islands. In the four decades after the Second World War it lost more than 40% of its population, and the haemorrhage continued between 1981 and 2001, with a 24% decrease to 1984 residents.
Between 2001 and 2009 there have been 329 deaths and 99 births.
The Bays of Harris is owned by the Hitchcock family who bought it for a reported £5000 after the death of Lord Leverhulme, the English industrialist, philanthropist, and politician who founded Lever Brothers with his brother James, which later became part of Unilever.
The Hitchcocks, who live in the south of England, have not commented about the buyout plan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article