A third runway at Heathrow would give Scotland access to the world's largest hub airport "on its doorstep" and double the UK's exports, business leaders have been told.
Heathrow CEO John Holland-Kaye said UK's only hub airport should be expanded over a rival bid from London Gatwick because it was the only option which would connect the UK, and Scotland, to the world and keep it competitive in the global marketplace.
Speaking today at a conference of aviation representatives in Glasgow organised by the Scottish Council for Development and Industry (SCDI), Mr Holland-Kaye said adding a third runway could double UK exports by 2020 and boost the number of long-haul destinations served by Heathrow from 80 to 120.
He said: "It would be the best connected airport in the world, and Scotland would have that right on its doorstep. We would have more capacity than Paris, Amsterdam or Frankfurt."
Mr Holland-Kaye and his counterpart at Gatwick, CEO Stewart Wingate, were making their cases to Scottish business leaders a day after the Airports Commission opened its public consultation on the airports' rival bids for expansion.
Heathrow bosses want to build a third runway while those at Gatwick want to add a second to meet growing demand for domestic and international routes, especially in rapidly growing economies such as China.
The UK Government-appointed Commission - which is also considering a third option not favoured by Heathrow bosses to extend the airport's north runway - will recommend one of the three proposals next summer.
Mr Holland-Kaye said Heathrow was already the conduit for more than a quarter of the UK's exports, including £80 million-worth of Scottish salmon and 400,000 of whisky annually, in comparison to less than 2 per cent passing through Gatwick.
However, Scotland has been increasingly squeezed out of the hub as short-haul domestic flights have made way for more lucrative long-haul routes. There are currently nine daily flights from Heathrow to Glasgow and 16 to Edinburgh, fewer than a decade ago.
"Failing to expand Heathrow would mean even fewer connections for Scotland as airlines choose long-haul over short-haul," said Mr Holland-Kaye.
He added that expansion would allow the airport to meet demand from airlines such as Air China, which have currently had to look elsewhere in Europe for landing slots.
However, Amanda McMillan, managing director of Glasgow airport - currently being purchased by Heathrow Airport Holdings' biggest shareholder, Ferrovial - said she wanted Scotland to have its own direct links with China.
She said airport bosses were already in talks about attracting a Chinese carrier to Glasgow "in the medium term".
Mr Wingate told the conference that a second runway at Gatwick would keep fares lower for Scottish passengers and better serve the growing low-cost market. He added that Gatwick already served a number of far-flung destinations such as Moscow, New York, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City and Jakarta but a second runway would "accelerate that growth" while offering passengers comparatively cheaper flights than Heathrow because of its foothold in the budget market with carriers such as Easyjet and Norwegian.
Mr Wingate, who started his aviation career as a customer service director at Glasgow Airport, said Gatwick bosses were also committed to keeping landing charges - the fee charged to airlines for using an airport - down. Gatwick currently charges around £9 per passenger and has vowed that if its expansion plans get the go-ahead it will absorb the cost to hold landing charges at a maximum of £15 by 2030. In comparison, Heathrow's landing charges are expected to double from around £20 per head to more than £40.
He said: "What is that going to do to ticket prices? It will be passed on to the passenger. A second runway at Gatwick will create the most competitive marketplace, and that will allow people in Scotland, the north and Northern Ireland to London and through London at the lowest cost."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article