Union leaders have told an inquiry into offshore helicopter safety that operators are subject to commercial pressures.
MPs on the Commons Transport Select Committee questioned representatives from helicopter operators, manufacturers, trade unions and industry bodies during an evidence session at the University of Aberdeen.
The committee's inquiry was set up after last year's fatal Super Puma L2 crash off Shetland. Members are looking at measures that might curb the risks offshore workers face from helicopter transport.
Four oil workers were killed when their helicopter plunged into the sea on August 23. Fourteen people survived.
John Taylor of Unite union said workers still did not feel able to raise safety concerns, and that, in the wake of the crash, unions had received hundreds of emails from concerned workers.
He said: "Everyone says you can refuse to do the job. As trade union officials we represent people who have refused to do the job and then they are suddenly dismissed. There is an environment still offshore where people have concerns about raising safety issues. This is an issue offshore and it's a concern offshore.
"And I believe that commercial pressure is operating in the industry."
Steve Todd, national secretary of the RMT union, said: "We believe there are commercial pressures. We can't prove it categorically but as we've said in our submission a public inquiry or judicial review looking into every aspect of the operation might tell us differently, and that is why we've called for that public inquiry."
But the claim was disputed by Mike Imlach, director of Bristow Helicopters, who said: "I can honestly say we've never been under commercial pressure where we've felt it's unsafe to continue a flight.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article