THE families of the 16 men who died in the 2009 Super Puma tragedy want to know what precautions could have been taken to avoid the disaster, an inquiry has heard.
Bond Offshore Helicopters has admitted proper procedures were not followed when problems first emerged with the AS332-L2 on March 25, a few days before the crash.
A magnetic particle was uncovered on the epicyclic chip detector component of the gearbox that day. But aircraft engineers carried out a different set of procedures due to confusion between Bond and Eurocopter staff during a phone call to the manufacturers.
It emerged after the tragedy that Eurocopter experts believed Bond engineers had discovered a problem with a different helicopter part.
A fatal accident inquiry into the men's deaths off the coast of Peterhead on April 1, 2009 is being held at the Town House in Aberdeen and is due to last six weeks.
Yesterday, lawyer Tom Marshall said the families of those who died wanted to know about the procedures in place which could have prevented the oil workers' deaths.
He said: "What precautions could have been taken to avoid the disaster, that's what the families want to know."
Former Bond maintenance manager John Crowther said engineers were being "very cautious" at the time of the crash because they were being scrutinised by air accident investigators. A Bond Super Puma had ditched near a BP oil platform in the North Sea in foggy conditions on February 18, 2009.
The 16 passengers and two crew had survived but at that time the cause of the incident was unknown. Air Accidents Investigation Branch staff were investigating Bond practices and procedures.
The inquiry heard that a similar problem with an epicyclic chip detector was uncovered on a Bond-operated helicopter in 2008.
Mr Crowther said he had not been aware of the problem with that aircraft in 2008 until after the tragedy the following year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article