Highland Council meets to finalise its cost cutting plans as it seeks savings of £55m over the next five years, but its most draconian proposals are being moderated or delayed.
It had been feared that 800-1,000 council jobs might have to go but that now looks certain to be reduced to around 314 full time equivalent (FTE) posts .
Education had been earmarked to bear £2m worth of cutbacks over two years, with up to 60 jobs going starting next year. But that has been delayed a year.
Budget leader Maxine Smith said opposition councillors had identified a one off saving of £500,000 which would allow a postponement. "We agreed, as it gives schools a year to work out how they can save 1% in staffing costs."
She said it wouldn't mean they necessarily have to cut a member of staff, but had to find a way of saving the equivalent amount of money. She said that for example they would be looking for savings across all secondary schools comparable to the cost of employing 15 teachers in total.
The authority says it remains committed to avoiding compulsory redundancies and therefore there is determined to manage these by natural staff turnover, retirement and vacancies.
Plans to reduce the primary school week had already been abandoned for at least a year.
But it does look certain that burial and parking charges will rise steeply. Car parks that currently charge six days a week in Inverness and Fort William are likely to start charging on Sundays as well. However the car parks which are free in smaller communities, will remain so.
"The opposition didn't like the idea of charging on Sundays, but we do need to do this to keep the others free," Ms Smith said.
She said the ruling SNP/Lib Dem/Labour coalition had been working with the Independent opposition councillors to identify the best way forward.
A Citizens' Panel Survey conducted in October-November attracted 1,234 responses on the range of proposed savings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article