RESEARCHERS believe they have uncovered a "genetic frontier" which separates Britain's Celtic nations from England.
Geneticists analysing thousands of male DNA samples from Scotland, England, Wales, and Ireland were baffled after discovering a number of of Y chromosome clusters among the Celtic populations - indicating that large numbers of modern men are descended from a handful of ancient kings or patriarchs - but finding no such patterns in England.
In Wales, the research indicates that almost one in five men - 19 per cent - are descended from only ten kings or patriarchs who reigned between 1,000 and 1,500 years ago.
In Scotland, around half of men with the Stuart or Stewart surname - regardless of the spelling - are believed to be descendants of Sir John Stewart of Bonkyll, a 13th Century nobleman who fought alongside William Wallace and whose subsequent lineage includes the Stuart monarch, James VI of Scotland.
Other "royal bloodlines" are also being traced, including potentially a genetic marker identifying descendants of Robert the Bruce.
Although England has always had a much large population than Scotland and Wales, researchers on the ScotlandsDNA project, which conducts parallel DNA studies across the British Isles, believe they would have found genetic clusters by now, if they existed.
They believe the contrast may be down to historic differences in how inheritance was passed down centuries ago, with England traditionally following a 'primogeniture' model, where the eldest son inherits everything, whereas Celtic culture practised 'partibility', where inheritance was evenly shared.
Alistair Moffat, historian and co-founder of ScotlandsDNA, said: "You would expect that William the Conqueror's noblemen, who became very wealthy as a consequence of the conquest, to have access to lots of women and to father a lot of children, and they almost certainly did.
"But because those children, if they were illegitimate, unlike in Celtic society, weren't recognised, or even if they had sons by the same woman, only the eldest son inherits, their sons and grandsons and so on gradually become less and less powerful, which in turn means their ability to access lots of women really diminishes.
"So you can see within quite a small number of generations how that power could dissipate completely.
"But it doesn't do that in Celtic society. In Scotland and Wales, it sustains itself. That's because, firstly, illegitimate children are recognised and, secondly, the principle of 'partibility' means everyone gets something."
The Norman invasion in 1066 laid the foundations for primogeniture because the new king of England relied on 20 large and wealthy landowners to supply him with soldiers. If landholdings were broken up, his ability to recruit and army would have weakened.
In comparison, in Scotland, clans formed armies through kinship ties. In Ireland, Turlough O'Donnell, a 14th Century lord, epitomised the mantra that "powerful men can breed an army" by accruing more than a thousand great-great-grandsons thanks to his prolific breeding.
"It's two different views of power," said Mr Moffat. "One is based on land, primogeniture; and the Celtic one is based on family. But they both have the same purpose: to create military dominance."
Mr Moffat said the hunt for genetic clusters, effectively long-lost royal bloodlines, in England was a "lost cause".
He said: "You would expect to find a glimmer or a hint by now, but they're just not there. The upshot is that the Scots and the Welsh are much more royal than the English.
"It's as though you cross the Cheviots and it changes. It's a real genetic frontier."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article