The Royal Household has given some of its top earners a "heck of an increase" while many staff had their pay frozen last year, according to an MP.
Margaret Hodge, chairwoman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, made the remarks yesterday as she grilled the Keeper of the Privy Purse about how staff on £21,000 received a pay freeze in 2012-13, while three of the five members of the Lord Chamberlain's committee were given extra.
Sir Alan Reid was asked by Ms Hodge: "Was it really sensible for three out of the five members of the Lord Chamberlain's committee, all earning over £100,000, to give themselves extra money when they were expecting staff on £21,000 not to have extra money."
Ms Hodge added: "It strikes me as being not a very good message for a public organisation to freeze the wages of its staff, from a very low level - from £21,000 - and then to see the top management award themselves (a rise)... I have no doubt you can justify them but... Seems to me not a very good message at a time of constraints."
Sir Alan stressed that his pay of £180,000 was frozen during the past financial year, as was the salary of the Queen's private secretary Sir Christopher Geidt, who earns £146,000 a year.
Mike Stevens, the Queen's deputy treasurer, told the MPs that Lieutenant Colonel Sir Andrew Ford, known as the Comptroller and head of the Lord Chamberlain's office, which organises ceremonial events such as investitures and garden parties, saw his salary increase last year by £7000 to £116,000 because he took on the extra responsibility of royal travel.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article