THE advertising watchdog has rejected complaints by the Scottish Government about a campaign promoting sunbeds as a source of vitamin D.
A leaflet for the Indigo Sun tanning centre said: "Exposure to UV light (whether from sunlight or sunbeds) is the most important source of vitamin D for people in the UK."
It went on to offer sunbed sessions within a limited time and ran a series of "fact versus fiction" questions surrounding their use.
The Scottish Government said the leaflet was misleading and irresponsible, and contradicted the World Health Organisation's advice on the use of sunbeds as a source of vitamin D.
Defending the leaflet, Indigo Sun said it was generally accepted that people in the UK got 90% of their vitamin D from exposure to UV light and that it was a fact that UV exposure from sunbeds stimulated vitamin D production.
They did not recommend the exclusive use of sunbeds as a source of UV and the leaflet included health warnings that customers should be aged 18 years or over, that people with fair skin or moles should avoid exposure and that all customers should avoid over-exposure and wear eye protection.
Rejecting the Government's complaints, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said it was widely accepted that UV light was the primary source of vitamin D for UK citizens.
It said: "We noted that the leaflet contained warnings regarding over-exposure, the need for eye protection and the need for people with certain skin types to avoid exposure to UV completely.
"We did not therefore consider readers would infer from the claim that there were no health risks associated with exposure to UV from sunbeds, or that sunbeds were any safer than sunlight."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article