The rising state pension age for women is also forcing their husbands to work for longer, a new study has revealed.
Researchers found 8300 more men were employed than they otherwise would have been after examining the impact of the increasing women's pension age over the past two years.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) suggested men’s changed behaviour could be due to husbands reworking plans so they can retire at the same time as their wife.
Alternatively, the think-tank said men are having to delay their own retirement to make up their partner’s lost pension income.
Co-author Jonathan Cribb said: “Increasing the age at which women can first receive their state pension has led to significant numbers of women deferring their retirement, with more than half of women aged 60 now in paid work for the first time ever.
“We also find some husbands are responding by remaining in work for longer.”
He added that the initial findings suggested the rise has had a positive impact on the jobs market.
Researchers used data since the female state pension age began to increase from age 60 in April 2010 to examine the impact on the labour market during the downturn.
Employment rates among 60-year-old women increased from 41.5% to more than half (51.4%) due to the rise to age 61 for retiring women.
It meant 27,000 more women were in work than otherwise would have been and overall there were 35,000 more men and women working as a direct result of the increase to the state pension age.
The report said UK’s public finances have been strengthened by about £2.1 billion as a result of the changes and future increases in the state pension age are likely to lead to a “substantial increase in employment”.
People taking retirement recently have recently been hit by falling annuity rates and Joanne Segars, chief executive of the National Association of Pension Fundswho described the study as intriguing added: “Some might be trying to postpone turning their pension pot into an annuity while rates are so poor.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article