Scotland could have avoided the financial crisis if it had been an independent country, according to the leader of the Yes Scotland campaign.
Blair Jenkins, the chief executive of the campaign organisation, talked about the strength of small economies during a webcast interview with BBC Scotland.
He said: "We might very well not have had the financial crisis had Scotland been independent."
He explained that Scotland was still "paying the price for negligence at a UK level" which has resulted in job losses and service cuts as well as other hardship measures.
Mr Jenkins added: "I think it's a key point that is not made often enough that all of us in Scotland, we are depending upon the UK government and the UK financial regulator to be doing their jobs and not to have allowed what did happen to happen.
"I think what all of us in Scotland were entitled to assume was that the UK government and the UK financial regulator were looking after our interests now it actually turns out they were asleep at the wheel."
The former TV news boss for the BBC and STV said small countries and small economies are the most successful.
He said: "When you look around the world it is very clear that the most successful economies in the world are small economies and that's becoming more and more true with the passing of time.
"Smaller countries and smaller economies are more nimble, they are able to adapt much more quickly, there's a greater coherence and unity of purpose
"If you look at the top 10 countries in the world and the top 10 economies in terms of GDP per head, they are small countries, many are smaller countries than Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article